- Parapolitics Daily
- Posts
- Will They Replace Biden with the Nazi-Connected Gavin Newsom?
Will They Replace Biden with the Nazi-Connected Gavin Newsom?
Plus: Erasmus lab as the key to understanding the next steps in the globalist agenda; Menendez still getting support from pro-Israel organizations; WHO plans to censor health information and dictate medications in a pandemic; the Congressional earmarks boondoggle; WEF advocating criminalizing climate "inaction"; the government buying location data.
Here are summaries of the top parapolitical stories from the weekend prior, ending , October 1, 2023:
+ Gruesome Newsom Part One: The Nazi Connection
California Governor Gavin Newsom is reportedly gearing up for a presidential campaign, positioning himself as a potential alternative to Joe Biden. Despite Newsom's contentious standing due to his staunch alignment with Bay Area politics, his succession could still be feasible given the questionable state of the Democratic primaries. Digging into Newsom's history reveals a familial fortune rooted in complex links to Nazi war criminal Otto von Bolschwing, and a beneficial business partnership which birthed Gavin Newsom’s success in the wine industry. Relationships with figures like Bolschwing and billionaire Getty family, may have exemplified questionable alliances but ultimately provided the groundwork for Newsom's prosperous political career.
+ Erasmus Blood On The Floor Connects All The Deep State Mates
Henry Kissinger's mentee, Klaus Schwab, was employed to quell opposition to initiatives by entities such as the European Union and NATO, using the Unified World Government Agenda as a tool. This scheme involved the strategic application of viral infections and vaccines. The primary European hub for this operation is the Rotterdam-based Erasmus lab, funded mainly by Royal Dutch Shell and the Dutch Royal Family. Anchored on AI revolution, Schwabs' book "The Fourth Industrial Revolution" presents Smart Hospitals, manned by AI doctors and nurses. The intriguing situations surrounding the Erasmus lab including shootings and health sovereignty intrusions foster skepticism. Webb believes they are scheme to create false narratives and drive mass acceptance of predetermined solutions, labelling it a "school play".
+ Pro-Israel establishment still in Sen. Menendez’s corner despite corruption charges
Despite increasing pressure for U.S Senator Robert Menendez to resign amidst corruption charges, Washington's pro-Israel establishment remains supportive. Menendez, a significant figure in Israel policy, has enjoyed long-standing relationships with pro-Israel organizations and notable political donators. Although no major donators have yet to contribute to Menendez's defense fund, many pro-Israel groups are simply advocating for due process amidst calls for Menendez to step down, expressing appreciation for his leadership in strengthening U.S.-Israel relations. Meanwhile, both Menendez and his pro-Israel committee replacement, Senator Ben Cardin, continue to play significant roles in the evolving dynamic of U.S.-Israel relations.
+ We're in the Middle of a Global Coup — Here's How We Stop It
Dr. Meryl Nass claims that the World Health Organization's plan for an upcoming pandemic treaty and International Health Regulation amendments presents a threat to national sovereignty and citizens' personal freedoms. The proposed agreement would compel nations to censor any health information that doesn't align with WHO standards, and dictate the medications countries must use in a pandemic. Critics assert that the treaty, which applies even outside of a pandemic, will grant unchecked power to the WHO to impose health directives. Furthermore, it may lead to fast-tracked vaccine development without proper testing and liability waivers for manufacturers. Advocacy groups, such as Door To Freedom, argue against these changes, stressing the need for public awareness and resistance.
+ Once Banned Congressional Earmarks Were Reintroduced in 2022; How Billions Are Being Spent
Despite the controversy and a decade-long ban, Congressional earmarks, which allow lawmakers to fund pet projects, have made a return widely exploited by both Republicans and Democrats. Critics argue that these earmarks, totaling up to $15 billion in tax dollars for 2024 alone, are potentially misused to funnel funds towards interests important to donors or supporters, rather than the American public. Data reveals that while Democrats control the Senate and make up three-fourths of earmarkers, three Republicans top the list for individual earmarks. Discussions reveal deep concerns over government wastage, questioning the wisdom of funding offbeat projects ranging from underwater games for dolphins to instruction on cooking insects.
+ WEF Pushes Criminalizing “climate inaction”
The World Economic Forum (WEF) suggests that "climate inaction" might be considered a human rights violation, foreseeing an upsurge in climate-related lawsuits. The WEF points out over 130 such global cases, forecasting an escalation as more human rights-related climate claims surface. Six youths recently initiated an unprecedented case at the European Court of Human Rights against 32 European nations for their alleged failure to confront climate change. WEF speaker and Norwegian Finance CEO, Kjerstin Braathen, last year warned of temporary discomforts like "pain," inflation, and "energy shortages" due to the World Economic Forum and the UN's climate change agenda, suggesting that such discomfort is necessary to address climate change.
+ Geofencing: How The Government Used Cell Phone Data To Try To Drive Calvary Chapel Out Of Business
In a controversial technological and legal practice known as "geofencing," mobile apps gain access to users' location data, often ending up sold to third-party entities. This raises constitutional questions when the government accesses this third-party data, as a lawsuit by Calvary Chapel against Santa Clara County argues. The suit claims that the county conducted non-permissioned surveillance of the church using geofence technology to track foot traffic patterns, constituting a breach of the Fourth Amendment's protection against "unreasonable search and seizure." While geofence advocates suggest this falls under an "administrative search" exception, critics argue that it violates the amendment's principle of particularity, whereby warrants must be specific to the individual, property, and place. A concurrent piece of legislation, "the Fourth Amendment is Not for Sale Act," also challenges warrantless government purchases of cell phone location data.
Want to support these journalists? Subscribe for $9.99 a month, and the revenue is distributed across the sources cited.
Reply